Immigrants from Uruguay vs Samoan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Samoan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Samoans
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Samoan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,556,340 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,791,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 0.15%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Samoan |
Minimum | 10.4% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 62.7% |
Range | 49.6% | 58.7% |
Mean | 29.9% | 23.3% |
Median | 21.6% | 20.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.7% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.0% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.3% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Samoans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.080%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |