Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chickasaw
5.5%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,202,140 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 7.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 7.4% | 20.0% |
| Range | 4.6% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Panamanian (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Israeli (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Iraq (5.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and Liberian (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Delaware | 7.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Iraqis | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 5.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Israelis | 4.8 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Panamanians | 4.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 4.7 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 3.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Liberians | 3.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Moroccans | 3.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 3.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 3.3 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.2 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |