Immigrants from South Africa vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Mongolian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Mongolians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Mongolian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,419,478 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,671,707 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 0.19%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Mongolian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 47.1% |
Range | 95.3% | 43.6% |
Mean | 31.9% | 19.9% |
Median | 23.5% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 23.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 10.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.4% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Mongolians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Chile (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Serbian (20.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |