Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
31.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,290,036 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.889 and weighted average of 3.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 46.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.40% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 21.2% |
Range | 26.9% | 18.8% |
Mean | 5.4% | 7.4% |
Median | 4.3% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are African (3.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Switzerland (3.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Black/African American (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Mexican American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bulgarians | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 37.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 35.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 34.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 3.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 34.7 /100 | #187 | Fair 3.0% |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |