Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,954,007 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.458 and weighted average of $67,234. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732, a difference of 25.1%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Chickasaw
Minimum	$22,500	$22,146
Maximum	$99,125	$78,125
Range	$76,625	$55,979
Mean	$67,143	$46,305
Median	$74,972	$45,875
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$47,057	$38,542
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$83,529	$53,486
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$36,471	$14,944
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$23,355	$12,086
Standard Deviation (Population)	$22,935	$12,005

Similar Demographics by Householder Income Over 65 years

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Latvian ($67,326, a difference of 0.14%), New Zealander ($67,333, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Afghanistan ($67,007, a difference of 0.34%), Korean ($67,472, a difference of 0.35%), and Cambodian ($66,892, a difference of 0.51%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Turks	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $68,037
Estonians	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $67,926
Russians	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $67,626
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $67,594
Koreans	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $67,472
New Zealanders	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $67,333
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $67,326
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $67,234
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $67,007
Cambodians	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $66,892
Australians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $66,891
Immigrants \| France	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $66,826
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $66,694
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $66,672
Israelis	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $66,636

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #283	Tragic $53,967
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.1 /100 \| #284	Tragic $53,950
Mexicans	0.1 /100 \| #285	Tragic $53,897
Chippewa	0.1 /100 \| #286	Tragic $53,847
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #287	Tragic $53,766
Paiute	0.1 /100 \| #288	Tragic $53,762
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #289	Tragic $53,737
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #290	Tragic $53,732
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic $53,711
Shoshone	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic $53,681
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic $53,665
Senegalese	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic $53,591
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic $53,420
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic $53,333
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic $53,265