Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,222,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 54.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 15.2% |
| Range | 8.2% | 14.8% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Australian (2.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |