Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
11.5%
POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,731,697 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 27.9%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 17.5% | 35.7% |
| Range | 15.6% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 16.2% |
| Median | 9.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |