Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
11.4%
DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 33.1%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 52.4% |
| Range | 32.2% | 43.9% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 22.5% |
| Median | 11.9% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.0% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Italy (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Europe (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |