Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Select to Compare
Ambulatory Disability
Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in percentage of population with ambulatory disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Mexican American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with ambulatory disability within an area, or if Mexican American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with ambulatory disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Mexican American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican American Indian Data | Ambulatory Disability Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 0.46% |
| Maximum | 48.8% | 19.4% |
| Range | 48.7% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 9.8% | 7.6% |
| Median | 7.6% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.5% |
Correlation Details
| Mexican American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Ambulatory Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 197,468,499 | 6.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 63,739,448 | 6.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 28,052,496 | 6.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 13,579,517 | 6.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 5,318,919 | 6.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 2,947,170 | 6.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 2,386,012 | 6.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 1,217,175 | 6.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 920,642 | 6.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.39% | 493,458 | 6.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 328,283 | 7.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 113,787 | 6.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 331,240 | 6.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 122,334 | 6.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 104,379 | 6.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.99% | 103,191 | 5.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 19,319 | 7.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.43% | 30,504 | 6.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.77% | 22,119 | 7.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.93% | 14,373 | 11.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 37,213 | 7.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.53% | 14,099 | 7.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 2,762 | 7.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.91% | 18,079 | 10.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 13,419 | 7.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 11,493 | 7.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.80% | 8,370 | 13.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.09% | 23,650 | 8.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 5,163 | 4.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.49% | 2,909 | 11.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.79% | 9,657 | 7.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.01% | 9,363 | 9.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 6,274 | 3.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 2,655 | 5.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.02% | 5,409 | 9.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.33% | 3,816 | 6.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.46% | 2,220 | 3.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 1,545 | 7.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.05% | 4,526 | 11.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 519 | 3.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.56% | 322 | 9.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.28% | 727 | 6.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.64% | 507 | 5.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.88% | 2,777 | 8.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.15% | 650 | 10.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.48% | 2,756 | 2.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.71% | 118 | 11.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.17% | 3,242 | 4.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.47% | 159 | 17.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.65% | 1,438 | 12.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.93% | 1,036 | 10.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.14% | 3,129 | 1.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.96% | 112 | 14.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.70% | 2,650 | 1.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 54 | 3.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.11% | 180 | 12.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.33% | 938 | 0.46% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 196 | 5.5% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.41% | 590 | 19.4% |
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.82% | 254 | 8.1% |