Ute vs Slavic Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Slavic
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ute
Slavs
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Slavic Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,656,713 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,835,227 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Slavic |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 10.9% | 15.4% |
| Range | 9.3% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.0% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Slavs by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Canadian (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Belgian (3.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Polish (3.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Hmong (3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |