Ute vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ute
 Immigrants from Australia
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Australia
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,656,713 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Australia | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.93% | 
| Maximum | 10.9% | 21.9% | 
| Range | 9.3% | 21.0% | 
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.0% | 
| Median | 4.8% | 3.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.9% | 
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Ute by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Spaniard (3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Canadian (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Belgian (3.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% | 
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% | 
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% | 
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% | 
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |