Ute vs Subsaharan African Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
Ute
Subsaharan African
Disability Age 5 to 17
Disability Age 5 to 17 Comparison
Ute
Sub-Saharan Africans
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
80.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Subsaharan African Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,569,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,132,058 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%.
Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 28.8% |
| Range | 6.3% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 5 to 17
Demographics Similar to Ute by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Estonian (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Ecuadorian (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Samoan (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 86.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Albanians | 83.7 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Samoans | 81.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Central Americans | 81.6 /100 | #149 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Guatemalans | 81.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Estonians | 80.8 /100 | #151 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Ute | 80.6 /100 | #152 | Excellent 5.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 79.7 /100 | #153 | Good 5.5% |
| Australians | 78.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 78.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.5% |
| Hawaiians | 78.0 /100 | #156 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 77.9 /100 | #157 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 77.1 /100 | #158 | Good 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 75.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are English (6.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Colville (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), German (6.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pima (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.2% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.2% |