Immigrants from Latin America vs Subsaharan African Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Subsaharan African
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Sub-Saharan Africans
15.0%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Subsaharan African Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,920,338 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,618,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 3.4%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 9.8% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 70.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.4% | 99.4% |
Mean | 16.7% | 21.1% |
Median | 15.7% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 23.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Inupiat (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.26%), West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Haiti (15.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Comanche (15.0%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |