Immigrants from Latin America vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Soviet Union
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,946,511 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 0.89% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 6.1% |
Range | 13.8% | 5.1% |
Mean | 2.9% | 3.2% |
Median | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.94% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |