Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from Bahamas
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Immigrants from Bahamas
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,940,819 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,634,972 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 5.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.49% |
Maximum | 6.5% | 7.0% |
Range | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.0% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Armenia (2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Colombian (2.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |