Immigrants from Cuba vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Native/Alaskan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Natives/Alaskans
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Native/Alaskan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,940,819 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 52.9%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 0.47% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 6.5% | 13.7% |
Range | 6.1% | 11.7% |
Mean | 2.6% | 6.0% |
Median | 2.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Armenia (2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Colombian (2.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |