Immigrants from Cuba vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Sub-Saharan Africans
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,939,480 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 4.3% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 33.8% | 69.8% |
Range | 29.5% | 69.4% |
Mean | 16.4% | 20.8% |
Median | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |