Immigrants from Cuba vs Brazilian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Brazilian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Brazilians
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Brazilian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,940,819 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,867,149 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 5.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.82% |
| Maximum | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Range | 6.1% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.65% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.88% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.88% | 1.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Armenia (2.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uruguay (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Colombian (2.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 97.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 96.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 96.8 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Somalis | 96.7 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.7 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |