Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Sub-Saharan Africans
36.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,730,067 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357 and weighted average of 36.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 15.8%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 57.6% | 84.5% |
| Range | 51.4% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 32.0% | 40.3% |
| Median | 35.6% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Hopi (36.5%, a difference of 0.58%), Pima (35.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |