Kiowa vs Australian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Kiowa
Australian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Kiowa
Australians
17.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Australian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,000 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,011,363 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 61.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Australian |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 46.2% | 38.6% |
| Range | 37.8% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 21.6% | 14.3% |
| Median | 22.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.1% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.8%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 92.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 92.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |