Japanese vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,084,223 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $55,082, a difference of 38.2%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $66,125, a difference of 28.5%), and median family income ($97,288 compared to $123,831, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $54,830, a difference of 4.7%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $44,587, a difference of 15.7%), and median household income ($83,395 compared to $100,306, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 46.6%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.9%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.7%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 95.9%), no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 92.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 90.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.2%).