Immigrants from Romania vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,056,423 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.094% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to a decrease of 94.0 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 47.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,633 compared to $90,186, a difference of 22.7%), and median family income ($113,434 compared to $92,513, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $55,726, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($42,718 compared to $40,773, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($51,337 compared to $45,204, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 68.6%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 45.2%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 33.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 37.2%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.76%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 158.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 25.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 56.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 67.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 59.7%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.4%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.4%).