Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,739,013 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 10.2 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $54,066, a difference of 5.7%), and per capita income ($53,806 compared to $55,780, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($125,150 compared to $125,546, a difference of 0.32%), median male earnings ($66,903 compared to $66,472, a difference of 0.65%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $70,470, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.41%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.26%), currently married (48.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.8%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.070%), associate's degree (55.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and college, under 1 year (71.3% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.93%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.0%).