Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
New Zealander
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
New Zealanders
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,314,944 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,265,230 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 26.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | New Zealander |
Minimum | 2.4% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 46.4% | 52.9% |
Range | 44.0% | 48.7% |
Mean | 22.9% | 17.6% |
Median | 21.3% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |