Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
New Zealander
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
New Zealanders
24.0%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
11.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.9%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs New Zealander Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,172,101 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 24.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,853,800 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 22.9%, a difference of 5.1%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | New Zealander |
Minimum | 10.8% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 42.1% | 58.3% |
Range | 31.3% | 51.8% |
Mean | 25.3% | 25.4% |
Median | 23.9% | 21.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.3% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 30.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 65 to 74
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Portugal (24.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (24.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Jamaican (24.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Ghanaian (24.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Pennsylvania German (24.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
French | 15.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 23.9% |
Nicaraguans | 14.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 23.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 13.6 /100 | #214 | Poor 24.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 13.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 24.0% |
Jamaicans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 24.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 24.0% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 24.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 11.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 24.0% |
Ghanaians | 10.4 /100 | #220 | Poor 24.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 9.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 24.1% |
Native Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 24.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 8.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 24.1% |
Immigrants | Panama | 8.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bermudans | 8.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 24.2% |
Iraqis | 8.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Swiss (22.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (22.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Morocco (22.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Finnish (22.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (22.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Belgians | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 22.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 22.7% |
Arabs | 84.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 22.8% |
Danes | 84.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 22.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 84.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 22.8% |
Alsatians | 83.7 /100 | #146 | Excellent 22.8% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 22.8% |
New Zealanders | 79.9 /100 | #148 | Good 22.9% |
Swiss | 79.7 /100 | #149 | Good 22.9% |
Canadians | 77.7 /100 | #150 | Good 22.9% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 77.6 /100 | #151 | Good 22.9% |
Finns | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 22.9% |
Slavs | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 23.0% |
Sri Lankans | 74.0 /100 | #154 | Good 23.0% |
British | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 23.0% |