French American Indian vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
French American Indian
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
French American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
17.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,963,087 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 3.6%.

Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | French American Indian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 4.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 40.3% |
Range | 24.3% | 38.0% |
Mean | 16.5% | 18.5% |
Median | 16.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.0% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Samoan (17.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Cree (17.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (17.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Malaysian (17.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Grenada (17.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Mexicans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.8% |
Paiute | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 17.8% |
Jamaicans | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 17.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 17.9% |
Samoans | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 17.9% |
French American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 17.9% |
Malaysians | 0.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.6 /100 | #252 | Tragic 17.9% |
Hopi | 0.6 /100 | #253 | Tragic 17.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.6 /100 | #254 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |