Celtic vs Shoshone Family Poverty
COMPARE
Celtic
Shoshone
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Celtics
Shoshone
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
64.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Shoshone Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,628,915 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,600,445 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 23.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Shoshone |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 37.5% |
| Range | 97.2% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 12.7% |
| Median | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
| Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
| Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |