Romanian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Burmese

Excellent
Exceptional
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 349,134,744 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to a decrease of 44.5 Burmese.
Romanian Integration in Burmese Communities

Romanian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,994 compared to $103,145, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $121,444, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $71,139, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.20%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $54,800, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $52,005, a difference of 7.3%).
Romanian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricRomanianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Romanian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.8%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
Romanian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Romanian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Romanian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%

Romanian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Romanian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Romanian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Romanian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianBurmese
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
26.4%

Romanian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Romanian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
6.8%

Romanian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Romanian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.6%

Romanian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Romanian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricRomanianBurmese
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%