Romanian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,092,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.872. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 57.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $77,465, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $58,162, a difference of 8.5%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,544 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.8%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.22%), college, 1 year or more (62.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.0%).