Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Israeli Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,749,867 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Israelis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 304.0 Israelis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $52,596, a difference of 32.1%), median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $63,228, a difference of 25.7%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $118,577, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $52,335, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $43,852, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $66,636, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.68%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.87%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 75.6%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Israeli communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.75%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.2%).