Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Bulgarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,304,730 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Bulgarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Bulgarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $50,906, a difference of 27.8%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $117,818, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $113,883, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $54,352, a difference of 11.5%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $43,638, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $66,236, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 51.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.4%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.4%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.8%).