Chickasaw vs Liberian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Liberian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Liberians
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Liberian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,874,935 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 0.10%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Liberian |
Minimum | 5.1% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 68.8% | 55.1% |
Range | 63.7% | 54.8% |
Mean | 24.3% | 20.3% |
Median | 21.7% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Liberians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.2% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.2% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 19.9% |