Ecuadorian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Ecuadorian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
19.0%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,616,550 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 19.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.46% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Potawatomi (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.0%, a difference of 0.39%), French American Indian (18.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Ghana (19.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Alsatians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 0.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Shoshone | 0.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.8% |
| French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.2% |
Ecuadorian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 35.8% | 50.6% |
| Range | 35.7% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 20.3% |
| Median | 8.6% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 10.1% |
Correlation Details
| Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,161,973 | 17.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 34,962,071 | 15.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 17,976,260 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,746,765 | 15.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,676,828 | 18.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,796,210 | 19.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,879,640 | 19.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,105,106 | 22.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,864,722 | 18.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,025,991 | 18.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,002,072 | 17.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 691,880 | 15.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 269,822 | 20.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 208,323 | 21.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 354,968 | 15.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 283,651 | 23.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 74,462 | 20.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 16.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 94,473 | 19.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 75,504 | 12.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 158,793 | 27.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 97,609 | 13.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 197,914 | 21.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 15.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 217,238 | 21.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 181,924 | 27.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 148,572 | 11.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 103,971 | 20.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 152,490 | 11.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 33.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 31,554 | 13.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 4.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 51,505 | 4.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 224,421 | 23.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 32.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 18.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,456 | 16.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 22,800 | 34.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 11.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.89% | 105,521 | 13.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 15.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.12% | 6,556 | 50.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 108,046 | 13.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,070 | 21.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 42,547 | 32.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 27,708 | 10.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 3,262 | 3.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 10,396 | 8.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.55% | 275 | 5.7% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 34.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,946 | 21.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 8.6% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 20.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 27.5% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 30.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 50.5% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 43.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 38.4% |