Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ghanaians
Chickasaw
42.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,506,796 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 42.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 8.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 16.2% | 20.0% |
| Maximum | 82.9% | 65.4% |
| Range | 66.7% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 45.7% | 47.8% |
| Median | 44.9% | 48.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.1% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.1% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eritrea (42.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Sudanese (42.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
| Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |