Ghanaian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ghanaians
Chickasaw
16.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,166,774 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.437 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 109.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 39.6% | 15.9% |
| Range | 38.9% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 6.1% |
| Median | 8.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Ghana (16.6%, a difference of 0.95%), Immigrants from Belarus (16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Cypriot (15.7%, a difference of 5.0%), Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and Tohono O'odham (15.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |