Marshallese vs Apache Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
 Apache
 Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Apache
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Apache Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,687,885 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 31.2%.
 
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Apache | 
| Minimum | 7.9% | 8.2% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 92.1% | 91.8% | 
| Mean | 38.6% | 49.1% | 
| Median | 23.3% | 45.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 24.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 64.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.1% | 39.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 28.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 27.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Apache by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Creek (16.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Tohono O'odham (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Pueblo (21.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 16.3%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 16.4%  | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 16.4%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 16.5%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 16.7%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 16.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 16.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 17.0%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 17.2%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 17.7%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 18.3%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 18.4%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 19.1%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 19.3%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 19.6%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 20.0%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 20.2%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 21.3%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 21.6%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 21.6%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 21.6%  |