Ethiopian vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ethiopians
Sub-Saharan Africans
44.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,255,094 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 44.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 4.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 23.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 89.5% | 84.5% |
| Range | 65.7% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 47.3% | 40.3% |
| Median | 45.2% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.0% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.4% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Cambodia (44.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (44.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Mexico (44.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican American Indian (44.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (44.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 44.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |