Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
39.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,174,675 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 9.1%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 12.5% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 67.9% | 84.5% |
Range | 55.4% | 82.7% |
Mean | 45.1% | 40.3% |
Median | 45.9% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.1% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.4% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Brazilian (46.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (46.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (46.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
Colombians | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.3% |
Fijians | 30.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.3% |
Choctaw | 29.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |