Portuguese vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Portuguese
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Portuguese
Sub-Saharan Africans
47.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,286,612 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 47.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 11.2%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 30.1% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 88.3% | 84.5% |
| Range | 58.2% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 49.4% | 40.3% |
| Median | 48.9% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 44.3% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.9% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are New Zealander (47.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jordan (47.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (47.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Iraq (47.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 88.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Osage | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 47.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 87.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Laotians | 86.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Okinawans | 85.3 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 84.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.4% |
| New Zealanders | 84.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.4% |
| Portuguese | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 83.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 82.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.7 /100 | #135 | Good 47.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |