Ethiopian vs Iroquois Currently Married
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Iroquois
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ethiopians
Iroquois
44.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
44.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Iroquois Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,255,094 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 44.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,297,556 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254 and weighted average of 44.7%, a difference of 0.45%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 23.8% | 14.1% |
| Maximum | 89.5% | 66.7% |
| Range | 65.7% | 52.6% |
| Mean | 47.3% | 44.5% |
| Median | 45.2% | 46.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.0% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.4% | 51.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Iroquois by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Cambodia (44.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (44.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Mexico (44.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican American Indian (44.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (44.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (44.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Alaskan Athabascan (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Cuban (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Seminole (44.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Spanish Americans | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |