Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,455,997 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 13.6%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 20.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 84.5% |
Range | 79.4% | 82.7% |
Mean | 54.6% | 40.3% |
Median | 52.0% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.5% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.4% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Slavic (48.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ukrainian (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tongan (48.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovak (48.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from England (48.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
French | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Asians | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Slavs | 98.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Ukrainians | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Tongans | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Slovaks | 98.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | England | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Canadians | 98.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Macedonians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |