Yup'ik vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Yup'ik
 Subsaharan African
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Yup'ik
Sub-Saharan Africans
39.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,963,234 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.484 and weighted average of 39.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 6.7%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 15.4% | 1.8% | 
| Maximum | 65.0% | 84.5% | 
| Range | 49.6% | 82.7% | 
| Mean | 40.2% | 40.3% | 
| Median | 39.2% | 40.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.1% | 35.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.3% | 44.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 8.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 14.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 13.9% | 
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Puerto Rican (39.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (39.8%, a difference of 0.18%), British West Indian (39.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (40.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Black/African American (39.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 40.6% | 
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 40.6% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 40.5% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 40.4% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 40.3% | 
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 40.3% | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 40.1% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% | 
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% | 
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |