Ethiopian vs Subsaharan African Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Subsaharan African
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Sub-Saharan Africans
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
68.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
4.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Subsaharan African Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,239,511 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 44.2% |
Range | 21.8% | 42.0% |
Mean | 6.0% | 10.4% |
Median | 4.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Moroccan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Iraq (5.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Laos (5.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |