Bhutanese vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Bhutanese
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,493,629 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 48.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 14.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 25.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 78.5% | 84.5% |
| Range | 53.1% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 49.2% | 40.3% |
| Median | 50.1% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.2% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.0% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Iranian (48.6%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (48.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Austrian (48.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Northern European (48.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iran (48.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Finns | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Belgians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Austrians | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.1 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Iranians | 99.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Russians | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.5% |
| Latvians | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |