Ukrainian vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ukrainians
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,616,463 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 48.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 13.6%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ukrainian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 39.7% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.5% |
| Range | 60.3% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 57.7% | 40.3% |
| Median | 52.3% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.9% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.7% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.1% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Slavic (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (48.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tongan (48.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovak (48.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from England (48.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| French | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Romanians | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Asians | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Slavs | 98.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Ukrainians | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Tongans | 98.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Slovaks | 98.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Canadians | 98.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Macedonians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 48.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |