Ethiopian vs Alaskan Athabascan Currently Married
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Alaskan Athabascan
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ethiopians
Alaskan Athabascans
44.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
44.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Alaskan Athabascan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,255,094 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 44.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,219 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.637 and weighted average of 44.6%, a difference of 0.29%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 23.8% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 89.5% | 82.4% |
Range | 65.7% | 72.8% |
Mean | 47.3% | 40.6% |
Median | 45.2% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.0% | 27.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.4% | 49.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 22.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Alaskan Athabascans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Cambodia (44.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (44.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Mexico (44.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican American Indian (44.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (44.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cuban (44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Seminole (44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Moroccan (44.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Iroquois (44.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 45.0% |
Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.3% |
Ugandans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 44.2% |