Costa Rican vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Costa Ricans
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
43.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,590,013 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 9.3%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 18.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 70.1% | 84.5% |
| Range | 51.3% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 50.2% | 40.3% |
| Median | 49.4% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.5% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.6% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Oceania (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |