Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
66.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,761,741 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 46.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 10.2%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 26.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 82.3% | 84.5% |
Range | 56.3% | 82.7% |
Mean | 51.1% | 40.3% |
Median | 50.5% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.1% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.0% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Southern Europe (46.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iraqi (46.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (46.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cherokee (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Delaware (46.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 68.6 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
Albanians | 68.6 /100 | #154 | Good 47.0% |
Arabs | 68.6 /100 | #155 | Good 47.0% |
Spanish | 68.1 /100 | #156 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 67.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
Cherokee | 66.8 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
Iraqis | 66.4 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 65.9 /100 | #161 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 65.4 /100 | #162 | Good 46.9% |
Delaware | 64.7 /100 | #163 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 64.2 /100 | #164 | Good 46.9% |
Samoans | 59.8 /100 | #165 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Syria | 59.3 /100 | #166 | Average 46.8% |
Spaniards | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 46.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |