Czechoslovakian vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,635,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 48.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 14.6%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 17.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.5% |
| Range | 82.7% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 56.0% | 40.3% |
| Median | 55.3% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.6% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.9% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.3% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are British (48.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Italian (48.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (48.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (48.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Canada (48.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Irish | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Hungarians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| British | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Finns | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Belgians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 48.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |