Immigrants from El Salvador vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
 Subsaharan African
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Sub-Saharan Africans
43.1%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,815,519 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.297 and weighted average of 43.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 27.7% | 1.8% | 
| Maximum | 52.9% | 84.5% | 
| Range | 25.1% | 82.7% | 
| Mean | 41.9% | 40.3% | 
| Median | 42.9% | 40.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.9% | 35.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.7% | 44.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 8.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 14.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 13.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Apache (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% | 
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% | 
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |